Tiger Woods Acts Smug In Dock. Philandering Past Doesn’t Impress Female Jury

Last week I told you about Tiger Woods losing a case against the memorabilia company Gotta Have It Golf despite showing up in court and giving 45 minutes of evidence for free!

Yesterday the attorney employed by the memorabilia company gave his personal assessment of Woods performance in court.

"He is kind of a smug guy, and frankly, I thought his performance was very flat," said Eric Isicoff

"The only reason that Woods was paraded into court was because they thought there would be this celebrity awestruck reaction.  I don't think he helped his case at all. I don't think there was any celebrity reaction.”

Isicoff also maintained Tiger’s philandering past worked against him with the all female jury of six who were obviously not impressed by Woods finding him guilty in the case and hitting him with a an order for $1.3 million.with the female jury.

Most people have had some impression on the guy.

Technorati Tags:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Two Naked Pics Of Holly Sonders. The Big News To Emerge From The 2013 PGA Show

Sarah Stirk Nipple Gate: Navy Top Leaves Viewers Disappointed

Holly Sonders Quits Golf Channel After Contract Talks Fail. Moves To Fox.