The Fifth Circuit Declares A Mulligan In The Golf Channel "Innocent Transferee ... - Forbes

I previously wrote about The Golf Channel case in my article The Fifth Circuit Slices The Golf Channel Into The Pond.

In a nutshell, Ponzi schemer Alan Stanford a/k/a Sir Scam-A-Lot contracted to purchase $5.9 million in advertising from The Golf Channel in connection with a golf tournament that he was hosting, for the purpose of attracting more high net worth suckers into his scheme.

Later, after Stanford’s pyramid had collapsed and a Receiver was appointed to clean up his gigantic mess, the Receiver sought to have The Golf Channel disgorge the $5.9 million on the grounds that the advertising provided to Stanford did not have any “utility to creditors”, and thus was a fraudulent transfer.

On appeal, the Fifth Circuit initially agreed with the Receiver, in an Opinion that drew significant criticism as not being protective of innocent commercial service providers, which The Golf Channel certainly was. But on The Golf Channel’s Motion for Rehearing, the Fifth Circuit gave itself a Mulligan, and this time let the Texas Supreme Court take a swing at the issue by way of certifying the following question to that latter court:

Considering the definition of “value” in section 24.004(a) of the Texas Business and Commerce Code, the definition of “reasonably equivalent value” in section 24.004(d) of the Texas Business and Commerce Code, and the comment in the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act stating that “value” is measured “from a creditor’s viewpoint,” what showing of “value” under TUFTA is sufficient for a transferee to prove the elements of the affirmative defense under section 24.009(a) of the Texas Business and Commerce Code?

As I mentioned in my first article, this is a very important case insofar the Fifth Circuit’s original ruling created substantial dangers for innocent businesses that might unwitting deal with a debtor in providing some service.

We can only hope that by taking the advice of the Texas Supreme Court as its caddy, the Fifth Circuit does better on the back nine than it did on the front nine.

Fore!

CITE AS

Janvey v. Golf Channel, Inc., 2015 WL 3972216 (5th Cir. June 30, 2015), certified question accepted (July 17, 2015). http://goo.gl/etwmVL

This article at http://onforb.es/1SKoeqz and http://goo.gl/CfzGHm

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Two Naked Pics Of Holly Sonders. The Big News To Emerge From The 2013 PGA Show

Image
The media centre at the 2013 PGA Show was buzzing yesterday.  Not because of anything that happened at the show.  God forbid! When I rocked in, several men (and one woman) were gathered around an iphone ogling and sharing  two pics of who they claimed were Holly Sonders naked. Now I have to hold my hands up and say, I had to google her to find out she’s from The Golf Channel. I don’t watch the Golf Channel because I don’t have an erectile dysfunction problem or need to rent a car from National.  I’m told adverts for both are all that’s on that channel. How they knew for certain it was her, I dont know.  Unless the cheeks of her ass were on her passport photo and they recognized them from there, but I doubt it. The First Pic The first pic is taken from behind. No pun intended.  The media guys say it was taken by her fiancee (?) and shows Holly in a white thong which has disappeared a dangerously long ways into the bummage.  I’m talking two aerial liquitabs and a hot whit
Read more

Sarah Stirk Nipple Gate: Navy Top Leaves Viewers Disappointed

Image
London: Sky Sports management this morning issued a statement  apologizing to subscribers after Sarah Stirk wore a navy dress live on air.  It is believed up to 60,000 horny golfers were left limp after they tuned in to final round coverage of the Valero Texas Open in the hope of getting a glimpse of the legendary Stirk starter buttons. “I pay my subscription, I’m bloody well entitled to see Sarah’s Wimbledon strawberries” said factory worker Paul Manning 52 from Hereford. “I even missed the ten minute freeview, coz my mate Derek tweeted that Stirk was going into the shot centre for ten minutes at 11pm”. The Sky statement read: We apologize unreservedly for the navy dress Sarah wore during last nights broadcast, through which no nipples were visible. This was due to a wardrobe malfunction. However we do intend to rectify this during our US Masters coverage and assure viewers that plenty of bridge rivets will be on show, both from Sarah and special guest Colin Montgomeri
Read more

Holly Sonders Quits Golf Channel After Contract Talks Fail. Moves To Fox.

Image
Tissues at the ready guys as this will come as a shock to you all that Holly Sonders , the female face of the Golf Channel, has quit and reportedly taken a job with Fox Sports. According to  reports Sonders, who appeared regularly on “Morning Drive” since 2011, could not come to an agreement on a new contract deal with the Golf Channel and was quickly snapped up by Fox Sports where she is expected to work on golf and NFL. Related: Holly Sonders Does The Ice Bucket Challenge We've had some fun with Holly over the last few years ( was that really her in those nudie pics? ) but now it looks like we'll be crying into those tissues. Join the GolfCentralDaily community on Twitter for loads more comment on and off the course. Follow @golfcentraldoc
Read more